Robbie George on Abortion

Jun 2, 09:59 AM

Although this is primarily a Canadian blog, we have to admit that we are influenced by things that happen in the States. The recent killing of abortionist George Tiller has led to much discussion about the legitimacy or illegitimacy of such acts. Robbie George, a Catholic philosopher at Princeton, several years ago came out with a very ironic statement:

I am personally opposed to killing abortionists. However, inasmuch as my personal opposition to this practice is rooted in a sectarian (Catholic) religious belief in the sanctity of human life, I am unwilling to impose it on others who may, as a matter of conscience, take a different view. Of course, I am entirely in favor of policies aimed at removing the root causes of violence against abortionists. Indeed, I would go so far as to support mandatory one-week waiting periods, and even nonjudgmental counseling, for people who are contemplating the choice of killing an abortionist. I believe in policies that reduce the urgent need some people feel to kill abortionists while, at the same time, respecting the rights of conscience of my fellow citizens who believe that the killing of abortionists is sometimes a tragic necessity-not a good, but a lesser evil. In short, I am moderately pro-choice.

Recently, however, he has clarified this and proven himself to be “pro-life,” regardless of the circumstances:

Whoever murdered George Tiller has done a gravely wicked thing. The evil of this action is in no way diminished by the blood George Tiller had on his own hands. No private individual had the right to execute judgment against him. We are a nation of laws. Lawless violence breeds only more lawless violence. Rightly or wrongly, George Tilller was acquitted by a jury of his peers. “Vengeance is mine, says the Lord.” For the sake of justice and right, the perpetrator of this evil deed must be prosecuted, convicted, and punished. By word and deed, let us teach that violence against abortionists is not the answer to the violence of abortion. Every human life is precious. George Tiller’s life was precious. We do not teach the wrongness of taking human life by wrongfully taking a human life. Let our “weapons” in the fight to defend the lives of abortion’s tiny victims, be chaste weapons of the spirit.

This debate keeps reminding me of A Man for All Seasons (thanks to Andrew for identifying it):

William Roper: So, now you give the Devil the benefit of law!
Sir Thomas More: Yes! What would you do? Cut a great road through the law to get after the Devil?
William Roper: Yes, I’d cut down every law in England to do that!
Sir Thomas More: Oh? And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned ‘round on you, where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat? This country is planted thick with laws, from coast to coast, Man’s laws, not God’s! And if you cut them down, and you’re just the man to do it, do you really think you could stand upright in the winds that would blow then? Yes, I’d give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety’s sake!

Being pro-life, we must be consistent. This doesn’t mean that we must adopt a pacifist’s unnuanced point of view; merely that we must abide by the laws which defend us all. Within these laws, we must do all in our power to defend the innocent, and of course we must also work as hard as we can to perfect the laws and make them better protect the innocent.

Catherine Nolan

Comment

  1. Can anyone, even a Pro-Abortion mentality, fail to see the irony, the sarcasm, in Robbie George’s original statement?

    He’s borrowing the enemies rhetoric, and begging them to disagree with him, thus hoisting themselves on their own petard.

    W

    — Warren · Jun 2, 12:58 PM · #

  2. Oh, sorry if I made it sound like Robbie George was inconsistent. I meant to use his first quote to show that the “pro-abortion yet anti-abortionisticide” stance is inconsistent, and his second quote to show that the pro-life stance is consistent.

    — Catherine · Jun 2, 01:20 PM · #

  3. Oh yes, I was clear on what you were saying, but I can fully imagine that a pro-abortion person would willfully misunderstand Robbie George, so as to create a media sensation.

    The “Anti-Abortion” stand of whoever killed George Tiller is fundamentally NOT a pro-life position. So, by tarring everybody with the brush of this person who killed an abortionist, they get to take (for a change) the position of the person aggrieved by the loss of life. It’s so sad, so sad.

    W

    — Warren · Jun 2, 01:33 PM · #

Commenting is closed for this article.